Hi guys,

just checking, was there a conclusion about this crash problem?

I think I can finally reproduce it after some hints from this thread.

Regards,
Robert


2015-09-27 20:01 GMT+02:00 Jens Radloff <[email protected]>:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> ok, so I will give you this teamviewer ID and password tommorrow morning
> by mail. I could be online from about 06:00 o'clock CET (we currently
> have summer time, so I think the difference to GMT is currently GMT plus
> 2 hours), is this too early for you? You are in a different time zone, I
> guess Eastern from mine.
>
> From which time on should I be online with my Ubuntu installation? I
> hope I do not miscalculate the time due to time zone differences, and our
> summer time.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jens
>
> Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015 schrieb Andrew Deryabin:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> 27.09.2015 21:31, Jens Radloff пишет:
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> >
>> > ok. So you can use my Ubuntu Studio installation directly.  This is
>> > also the best way to reproduce the behaviour. If I would set up a
>> > VM with Ubuntu Studio, then I would need to configure this VM
>> > exactly the same way as my direct Ubuntu Studio installation. And
>> > then there would be the chance that the behaviour cannot be
>> > reproduced in the VM.
>> >
>> > I will install Teamviewer tomorrow morning in my Ubuntu Studio
>> > installaiton. Then I will send you my IP address. I guess it will
>> > be valid until tommorow til 23:59 CET. Is ist okay for you to look
>> > at my system tomorrow?
>>
>> Ok, I'm planning to work all day (except 13:00-14:00 GMT) and be
>> sitting if front of my monitor :)
>> Teamviewer will give you ID (9 digits) and password (4 digits). I'll
>> need them to connect to you. ID will remain the same (it made up from
>> ethernet address), but password will change every time you restart
>> it. There is no need in your IP address.
>>
>> > If you need to apply a command that needs the password of my Ubuntu
>> > installation (with the sudo command), then I will type it in for
>> > you, okay?
>>
>> I think, that I'll install muse to some directory in your home dir,
>> so there will not be any need in your root password (I hope).
>>
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Jens
>> >
>> > Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015 schrieb Andrew Deryabin:
>> >> Hi Jens,
>> >>
>> >> The main reason for VM is private security.
>> >> So,  if you can give me access to your main OS ( variant b) ),
>> >> this will be the best way, of course :).
>> >>
>> >> 27.09.2015 19:26, Jens Radloff пишет:
>> >>> Hi Andrew,
>> >>>
>> >>> I could install a VM on my machine, but is this necessary?
>> >>>
>> >>> I have two systems installed on my machine:
>> >>>
>> >>> a) Debian 7.x
>> >>> b) Ubuntu Studio 14.04.3, where MusE is installed.
>> >>>
>> >>> Don't you have a machine or VM with Ubuntu Studio 14.04.x
>> >>> installed?
>> >>>
>> >>> Can it be avoided that I need to install a VM in b)?
>> >>>
>> >>> I could give you direct access to b) via teamviewer if you want,
>> >>> without any VM installed in b), if a VM is avoidable. I only
>> >>> would need to move two directories (two MusE songs) to a
>> >>> location which you cannot access ;-) There are no personal data
>> >>> located in b).
>> >>>
>> >>> What do you think about this?
>> >>>
>> >>> If I would grant you access to b) via teamviewer, without a VM
>> >>> installed there - would you then maybe change b), its programme
>> >>> setup and its general configuration, and maybe mess it up in
>> >>> order to fix the issue? Is this the reason why you ask me to
>> >>> install a VM?
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> Jens
>> >>>
>> >>> Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015 schrieb Andrew Deryabin:
>> >>>> Hi Jens,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ok. That's good.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> About metronome problem: I can suggest the following decision
>> >>>> (If you don't mind, of course): can you make a virtual machine
>> >>>> and run teamviewer it it?
>> >>>> I'll then can debug this problem more quickly :).
>> >>>> P.S. the VM's OS should be the same as yours.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 27.09.2015 16:21, Jens Radloff пишет:
>> >>>>> Hi Andrew,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I just downloaded and installed the latest clone - issue fixed.
>> >>>>> Thanks. But the other problem (loop mode, metronome button
>> >>>>> activated => crash) still exists.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Jens
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015 schrieb Andrew Deryabin:
>> >>>>>> Hi Jens,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Now all tracks are visible by default. Update is now pushed to
>> >>>>>> master.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 27.09.2015 11:47, Jens Radloff пишет:
>> >>>>>>> Hi Andrew,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thank you for announcing to fix this issue.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Jens
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015 schrieben Sie:
>> >>>>>>>> Hi Jens,
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> 27.09.2015 08:21, Jens Radloff пишет:
>> >>>>>>>>> Good morning Andrew,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the info. Now I can see all tracks in my songs,
>> >>>>>>>>> using a ~/.config MusE folder of a clone installation. I
>> >>>>>>>>> clicked all these buttons which by default hide certain
>> >>>>>>>>> kinds of tracks.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> About Out1 not visible problem. It's not displayed by
>> >>>>>>>>>> default (I think it shouldn't be fixed).
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Oops, sorry  - I wanted to say *It should be fixed*. It
>> >>>>>>>> seems that yesterday I wanted to sleep too much :)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I think it is not a good idea to not display all these
>> >>>>>>>>> kinds of tracks by default - if the user is unexperienced
>> >>>>>>>>> with MusE, or not as experienced as a MusE power user. All
>> >>>>>>>>> people using MusE for the first time will be confronted
>> >>>>>>>>> with the problem "why are certain tracks not displayed?".
>> >>>>>>>>> I do not think they will look at the buttons below the
>> >>>>>>>>> menu bar to resolve this problem. I did not look at these
>> >>>>>>>>> buttons, too.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> But this is only my humble opinion about this default
>> >>>>>>>>> setting.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Of course. I'll make them activated by default.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Jens
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Am Samstag, 26. September 2015 schrieben Sie:
>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jens,
>> >>>>>>>>>> About Out1 not visible problem. It's not displayed by
>> >>>>>>>>>> default (I think it shouldn't be fixed). Now you can
>> >>>>>>>>>> display missing tracks by clicking appropriate buttons on
>> >>>>>>>>>> "Outputs" toolbar. Attached png file shows them.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> 26.09.2015 16:42, Jens Radloff пишет:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrew,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have created a dump file using gdb in my debug
>> >>>>>>>>>>> installation. I attached the dump file to this email.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hope this helps.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> P.S.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In your output file I saw this message:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> readConfigMidiPort: device not found MDA DX10 LV2-0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Does it mean, that you do not have mda dx10 plugin
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> installed?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> This message seems to be related to the content of the
>> >>>>>>>>>>> folder ~/.config/MusE.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> When I start MusE with this folder which has been created
>> >>>>>>>>>>> by the official 2.2.1 release, then I can see in the MusE
>> >>>>>>>>>>> GUI
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> a) the Out 1 track
>> >>>>>>>>>>> b) the MDA DX10 LV2-0 plugin track
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> When I start MusE with this folder which has been created
>> >>>>>>>>>>> by a 2.2.1 clone, then I cannot see a) nor b) in the GUI
>> >>>>>>>>>>> of MusE. Both tracks are not displayed.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> To demonstrate this, I have attached two screenshots to
>> >>>>>>>>>>> this email:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> - The screenshot "new_muse_folder.png" shows the MusE GUI
>> >>>>>>>>>>> where the Out 1 track and the MDA DX10 LV2-0 track are
>> >>>>>>>>>>> *not* displayed: MusE runs with a ~/.config/MusE folder
>> >>>>>>>>>>> that has been created by a MusE 2.2.1 clone
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> - The screenshot "old_muse_folder.png" shows the MusE GUI
>> >>>>>>>>>>> where the Out 1 track and the MDA DX10 LV2-0 track *are*
>> >>>>>>>>>>> displayed: MusE runs with a ~/.config/MusE folder that
>> >>>>>>>>>>> has been created by the official MusE 2.2.1 release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> By the way, I created the attached dump file with a
>> >>>>>>>>>>> ~/.config/MusE folder that has been created by the
>> >>>>>>>>>>> official MusE 2.2.1 release. Due to this, there should
>> >>>>>>>>>>> be no message "device not found MDA DX10 LV2-0" in the
>> >>>>>>>>>>> dump file.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jens
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am Freitag, 25. September 2015 schrieb Andrew Deryabin:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jens,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the info.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> One more thing - your bug report doesn't have a
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> backtrace. Can you do the following:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> run in terminal:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> gdb /opt/muse_2.2.1_patched_debug_installation/bin/muse2
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ... do the same as before to make it crash...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> in terminal you will see gdb command line.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> type command:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> bt
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> this will produce backtrace. That's what we'll need to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> work further.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> P.S.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In your output file I saw this message:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> readConfigMidiPort: device not found MDA DX10 LV2-0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Does it mean, that you do not have mda dx10 plugin
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> installed?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 25.09.2015 20:51, Jens Radloff пишет:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Robert, hi Andrew,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So I just compiled and installed a new debug version of
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MusE from the current clone. I attached a dump file
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> about the behaviour, hope this helps.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding my jack settings: I do not know how to evoke
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> them on the command line, so I made a screenshot of my
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> jackd settings in qjacktl. See the attached screenshot.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The jack settings were automatically set by the Ubuntu
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> installation routine. I did not change them.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jens
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Freitag, 25. September 2015 schrieb Jens Radloff:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrew, hi Robert,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The issue "Another MusE crash: MusE 2.2.1, loop mode,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> metronome button activated" is NOT fixed!
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I played the file test_song.med in my fresh clone
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release installation (see my last email regarding this
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue), I forgot to click the metronome button.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What I just did, I clicked the metronome button, and:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> MusE crashes when the play cursor reaches the end of
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the loop region.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now I will first create a debug version of MusE using
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the clone source files and will create a debug file
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with hopefully better debug information.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jens
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Freitag, 25. September 2015 schrieb Jens Radloff:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Robert, hi Andrew,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the MusE installation I used to reproduce this
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behaviour is a release build.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today I did the following:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I recompiled and re-installed the latest clone as
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a release build. Before that I deleted the target
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subdirectory path muse/muse2 fort the git command,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and applied the command "git clone
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/muse- sequencer/muse.git". Then I
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied "cmake -i", "make" and "sudo make install".
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before running "sudo make install" I removed the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content of the destination directory of the command
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "sudo make install". (The other method, suggested by
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you, via "git pull" and "make clean" did not work
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because "make" resulted in an "Error 2": the file
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all.h was missing)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I ensured that there is no MusE folder in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~/.config
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. I started the build release of MusE.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. I loaded the file test_song.med into MusE.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. I again noticed that the file test_song.med does
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not have a Out 1 track in the GUI of MusE. I
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reported this behaviour before. This issue should be
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed. It is not possible to properly creatre music
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with MusE without an Out 1 track.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. I played this file, loop mode activated.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> => MusE does not crash anymore when the play cursor
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reaches the end of the loop region. I let this file
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> play several times through the loop region: MusE does
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not crash. I played this song again: MusE does not
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crash
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> => Issue "Another MusE crash: MusE 2.2.1, loop mode,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metronome button activated" is fixed.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> => I guess that by the "git pull" command, then
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "make" and "sudo make install" some files of an
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> older build in my build directory where copied to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the destination directory of the "sudo make install"
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command, so the directory where MusE was installed
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained both MusE programme files from an older
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the latest build, so it was messed up. So it is
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better not to use "git pull", but instead start from
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a clean and empty directory where one applies the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command "git clone
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/muse-sequencer/muse.git";, then
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cmake -i, then make, then make install.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you use a standard distribution?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My distribution is Ubuntu Studio. This is the release
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information about my Ubuntu Studio installation:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jrad@music:/etc$ lsb_release -a
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No LSB modules are available.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Distributor ID:       Ubuntu
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Description:  Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release:      14.04
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Codename:     trusty
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jrad@music:/etc$
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what settings do you start jack with?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AS the issue is now fixed on my system, we do not
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to look in the Jack settings of my system
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anymore.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no need anymore for me to build a debug
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version of the latest MusE clone or start MusE
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without plugins, as the issue is fixed on my system.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jens
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Donnerstag, 24. September 2015 schrieb Robert
>> >
>> > Jonsson:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jens,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-09-24 18:11 GMT+02:00 Jens Radloff
>> >>>
>> >>> <[email protected]>:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrew, hi Robert,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To ensure that this behaviour is not caused by an
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "old" MusE folder in ~/.config I removed the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory ~/.config/MusE and started MusE again, so
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a new, fresh MusE folder in ~/.config got created.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Background information: This "old" MusE folder in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~/.config is from my installation of MusE 2.2.1,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the last official release. I think Andrew told me
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that, if I use a current clone version of MusE,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then I need to remove the old MusE folder in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~/.config to get a new version of this folder
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created that is set up for the use of a current
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clone version of MusE.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me add at this point that now, with a new,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fresh MusE folder in ~/.config, I do not have a
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Out 1" track in any MusE song anymore which I
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created so far. I think I reported this bug some
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> months ago.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, as I wrote, I ensured that my clone
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> installation of MusE is based on a fresh MusE
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder in ~/.config.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But the behaviour can be still reproduced: MusE
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crashes when the metronome button is activated at
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the moment when the play cursor reaches the end of
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the loop region in this song test_song.med .
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this behaviour does not seem to be caused by the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content of the MusE folder in ~/.config.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, good so we can rule that out.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the output of gdb (I could only copy what
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is shown in the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> console):
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I only took a brief look but it seems the amount of
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information in the back trace is not much.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is the muse binary still built for release? Building
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it for debug may give more information.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some additional questions, sorry if you already
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answered before.. do you use a standard
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution? maybe we can reproduce your problem.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what settings do you start jack with?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The start of the printout below is what MusE outputs
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during running with -D, right? And you are starting
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MusE from within gdb?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless you already did so I would suggest that you
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recompile MusE similar to the below:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=debug
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make clean
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make install
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another thing you could try is to start MusE without
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins. and use MusEs own fluidsynth (under MESS)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as audio output. muse2 -pNI2
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had for instance an issue some years ago that
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some plugins caused corruption in MusE memory space
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> due to duplicated symbol names.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Robert
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lmuse-developer mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-de
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ve lo pe r
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- -- -- -- -- -- --- ---------
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lmuse-developer mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-dev
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> el op er
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Lmuse-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Lmuse-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer

Reply via email to