Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) replied on github web page:

platform/linux-generic/pktio/socket.c
line 14
@@ -643,6 +643,10 @@ static int sock_mmsg_recv(pktio_entry_t *pktio_entry, int 
index ODP_UNUSED,
                uint16_t pkt_len = msgvec[i].msg_len;
                int ret;
 
+               if (odp_unlikely(msgvec[i].msg_hdr.msg_flags & MSG_TRUNC)) {
+                       odp_packet_free(pkt);


Comment:
The error bit simply says the packet was truncated to max length. Perhaps the 
application is only interested in the first few bytes of a packet?

> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
> `ring->frame_num = next_frame(first_frame_num + nb_tx - 1, frame_count);` is 
> an alternative here.


>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>> Since `ring->rd_num` is a power of two, is the concern here that the `%` 
>> operator might result in a division if the compiler doesn't know that it's a 
>> power of two? In that case:
>> ```
>> return ++cur_frame & (frame_count - 1);
>> ```
>> solves that problem and avoids conditional branching.


>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>> If we're cleaning up, might as well delete that extraneous `+` in the above 
>>> line: `TPACKET_ALIGNMENT + + (pz - 1)) & (-pz);` I'm surprised the compiler 
>>> doesn't flag that since it's normally so picky about issuing warnings.


>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>> Not sure I understand what `out_octets_tbl` is accumulating here. If I'm 
>>>> sending three 100 byte packets this will set `out_octets_tbl[0]` to 100, 
>>>> `out_octets_tbl[1]` to 200, and `out_octets_tbl[2]` to 300. 


>>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>>> Since you're doing miscellaneous cleanups anyway, perhaps changing `len` 
>>>>> to `num` here should be considered? `len` is confusing since it doesn't 
>>>>> represent packet length.


>>>>>> Matias Elo(matiaselo) wrote:
>>>>>> The odp_pktin_maxlen() API states:
>>>>>> > Maximum frame length in bytes that the packet IO interface can receive.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I interpret this so that the application shouln't see packets which 
>>>>>> exceed pktin max length.
>>>>>> 


>>>>>>> muvarov wrote
>>>>>>> same here.


>>>>>>>> muvarov wrote
>>>>>>>> maybe to just set error bit and deliver this packet to application?


https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/397#discussion_r162226739
updated_at 2018-01-18 01:19:27

Reply via email to