Bert Meersma schreef:
Hi Rafaella,
I think that we have this scenario because the Community is performing
100% review on a 400000 words large volume.....
Usually, we would perform 10-20% review on a such large volume and we
would indicate some typical bugs that need to be corrected throughout
the files and we would not mention every single one as the Dutch
Community is doing. So this is mainly the reason why there are so many
issues filed in each QA form.
Bert and all,
any idea on how we can optimize this approach so that it can work both
for you and us?
Well I'm not sure. If you have any suggestions, please let me know.
I know you already did the suggestion not to do a full review of all the
helpcontent, but I'm still not convinced that that would result in a
high quality help.
If there's anyone else around on this mailing list who knows of a good
way, please let us know here.
Regards,
Bert
I think we should review all files.
Like Bert I'm also not convinced that it would result into a
Help-quality the community can support if we don't !
I see no point in cutting corners and seeing the Help as it is,
to my opinion it doesn't stand up to our standard.
--
DiGro
------------------------------------------
Scanned for virusses with Norton Antivirus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
