Hi Rafaella, Bert, Dick and others
I think that we have this scenario because the Community is
performing 100% review on a 400000 words large volume.....
Usually, we would perform 10-20% review on a such large volume and
we would indicate some typical bugs that need to be corrected
throughout the files and we would not mention every single one as
the Dutch Community is doing. So this is mainly the reason why there
are so many issues filed in each QA form.
Bert and all,
any idea on how we can optimize this approach so that it can work
both for you and us?
Well I'm not sure. If you have any suggestions, please let me know.
I know you already did the suggestion not to do a full review of all
the helpcontent, but I'm still not convinced that that would result
in a high quality help.
If there's anyone else around on this mailing list who knows of a
good way, please let us know here.
Regards,
Bert
I think we should review all files.
Like Bert I'm also not convinced that it would result into a
Help-quality the community can support if we don't !
I see no point in cutting corners and seeing the Help as it is,
to my opinion it doesn't stand up to our standard.
I have the same opinion. I have reviewed now 38 *.xhp-pages that are not
mentioned in
the file "Taakverdeling.sxc" and have already 115 remarks. My list for
making issues at the
end of the review is still growing.
With regards,
Henk van der Burg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
