On 7/28/01 11:56 PM, "Jeff Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Various projects have tried this (#cocoon was the last I noticed), and
> they always seem to peter out.
The one we use for #turbine is always fairly active, a lot of our
decisions get made in IRC actually because we sometimes have
10+ people there. We should probably make a point of logging the
discussion on a daily basis.
I don't think Jon would mind if there was a #log4j channel
on the server, but he can answer for himself :-)
> How about proposing a #jakarta IRC channel for all apache projects?
> Either on a network like openprojects.net, or perhaps Jon Stevens could
> re-open the IRC server on cvs.working-dogs.com, where the PMC meeting
> was once held.
>
> --Jeff
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 06:18:06PM -0700, Paul Glezen wrote:
>> Would it be a good idea to have an IRC channel dedicated to log4j? This
>> way if someone has a quick question and someone else is online, it could be
>> answered efficiently without clogging up everyone's mailbox. I'm not
>> recommending anything fancy like FAQ bots and stuff. Just an IRC net that
>> doesn't mind the traffic.
>>
>> On a couple occasions I've started a channel #log4j just to see what would
>> happen. I wasn't overwhelmed with traffic.
>>
>> - Paul
>>
>> Paul Glezen
>> IT Specialist
>> Software Services for WebSphere
>> 818 539 3321
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
