Actually, I was originally proposing something along Jeff's line. Ceki,
being more giving was thinking of being on line to answer questions from
the general public. I was thinking along the lines of online discussions
between the developers. A #log4j channel rather than a #log4j-help
channel. Of course, once word got out, the former would become the later
and it would be hard to get work done.
Jeff, do you find this to be the case with #turbine?
Paul Glezen
IT Specialist
Software Services for WebSphere
818 539 3321
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/29/2001 09:33:41 AM
Please respond to "LOG4J Developers Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LOG4J Developers Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Log4j on IRC
On 7/28/01 11:56 PM, "Jeff Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The one we use for #turbine is always fairly active, a lot of our
decisions get made in IRC actually because we sometimes have
10+ people there. We should probably make a point of logging the
discussion on a daily basis.
I don't think Jon would mind if there was a #log4j channel
on the server, but he can answer for himself :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
