<release-notes> Changes from Ant 1.6.2 to Ant 1.6.3 ===================================
Changes that could break older environments: -------------------------------------------- * The subant task used the canonical version of a file path. This has been changed to use the absolute path. Bugzilla 30438. * Tar now writes two EOF blocks rather than one. Bugzilla report 28776 ... </release-notes> Regards, Simon -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:23 -0700, Mark Womack wrote: > Hm. I am using Ant 1.6.2, which should have the fix? > > -Mark > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Simon Kitching" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org> > Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 9:02 PM > Subject: Re: 1.2.11rc1 Build > > > > On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 13:48 +1000, Paul Smith wrote: > >> yep, that tar's downloading ok. > >> > >> The tar has an error when unpacking though, or maybe it's just a > >> warning. When I do > >> > >> tar xfz logg*.tar.gz > >> > >> I get: > >> > >> tar: A lone zero block at 18809 > > > > That's a known bug in the Ant tar task: see > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28776 > > > > You should use a fixed version of Ant to build the release. > > > > Most versions of tar just ignore this problem anyway. However one > > particular release of gnu tar tightened up checks and turned this into a > > warning. Later versions of gnu tar dropped the warning message for this > > problem as it was causing so many reports if I remember correctly... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
