> Initial scan that I've found are (and these are probably just left > over stuff from 1.2.8/9 release) > > * LICENSE.txt is 1.1 License. Do we need to update that to 2.0?
And the source headers still reference the 1.1 license. If we update the license, we will need to update all the source headers. I don't know the answer here. Ceki, Yoav, do you know the policy regarding the updating of the license with releases like this? I guess we can always ask the board what the guidance is, if need be. I suspect that all new releases should be under the 2.0 license. > * INSTALL file references the old 'jakarta' directory naming days. > Do we want to update that? I'm sure it won't hinder people, but it > will look nicer. We should clean it up. > * Do we always create a source and binary combined release? It's > fine if it is, just can't remember to be honest. Yep. > * docs/index.html is a page that is a little too "new". For example, > the side bar has a Chainsaw link in it that goes nowhere. Hmmm.. > That may be confusing. On the same note the "Download" link within > the distro still says ,"1.2.9". (also references the new Chainsaw 2 > as well). I checked out the latest logging-site before doing the build (it looks like the build targets include some docs from the logging site?). Kind of a chicken and egg problem here. Other stuff that has been pointed out: - The 1.2.9 release has a lot of empty directories in it. This appears to be related to the cvs checkout options (not pruning empty dirs). I fixed it in the 1.2.11rc1 release. - The tar error when unpacking. I updated to Ant 1.6.4 for the next build. It should be resolved with that. I'm going to open a bug later tonight with these issues and others can be added as they are found so we can track this. I want to resolve and release by the end of this week (after we vote to release it, of course). -Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
