On 5/4/2013 7:02 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Thank you for reminding me. I did a quick check, then I saw its
actually worse. I found a couple of classes which we need to look into
before can make this release. Not even that they are duplicated, I
found one class which has a different implementation. :-(
Wow! I'd have assumed that the classes were just copied over from some
log4j 1.2.x version or another. Perhaps they were and then someone felt
like improving upon them and didn't understand their ancestry.
That said, I would like to require companions 1.2 at least 1.2.16 if
not 1.2.17. Jess, would this work for you?
I'm absolutely fine with requiring 1.2.17.
--
Jess Holle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
