Why not number the extras module the same as the version of log4j it requires?
Gary On May 4, 2013, at 8:33, Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com> wrote: > On 5/4/2013 7:02 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> Thank you for reminding me. I did a quick check, then I saw its >> actually worse. I found a couple of classes which we need to look into >> before can make this release. Not even that they are duplicated, I >> found one class which has a different implementation. :-( > Wow! I'd have assumed that the classes were just copied over from some log4j > 1.2.x version or another. Perhaps they were and then someone felt like > improving upon them and didn't understand their ancestry. >> That said, I would like to require companions 1.2 at least 1.2.16 if >> not 1.2.17. Jess, would this work for you? > I'm absolutely fine with requiring 1.2.17. > > -- > Jess Holle > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
