That is essentially the same thing Matt is doing with his builders.

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 2, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I don't recall Jackson providing a way to specify constraints or default 
>>> values.  Does it?
>> 
>> I do not think so, but you an init a non-final field yourself and let 
>> Jackson override it as suggested here:
> 
> http://jackson-users.ning.com/forum/topics/default-value-for-missing-int-property-when-deserializing-json
> 
> Gary
>  
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 2, 2014, at 6:19 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not trying to handle all cases under the sun. But... we've chosen NOT 
>>>> to use an XML Schema based XML IO framework (like JAXB or Jackson), 
>>>> instead we've invented our own. I know we do JSON as well, but so does 
>>>> Jackson and it likely also has a plugin for YAML. So now, every time I'm 
>>>> looking for some minor improvement, it means tweaking our custom framework 
>>>> or adding boilerplate code to plugins. It's a pain, but that's where we 
>>>> are today. At least now, with the new type converters, I get the type 
>>>> conversion from to int for free :-)
>>>> 
>>>> In this case, I meant, you can only use attribute A or B.
>>>> 
>>>> It is probably worth stepping back and looking at the big picture and 
>>>> whether we want to invest in improving the current config IO framework or 
>>>> at least consider if Jackson would be a better fit. Likely not for 2.0 ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> Gary
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Are you looking for annotations to handle every kind of thing you might 
>>>>> like to do instead of just putting a couple lines of code in the factory 
>>>>> method? I would have handled this by saying foo and bar both need to be 
>>>>> Integer and then adding a line do code that insures exactly one, or at 
>>>>> most one, is present ( depending on what you want ). 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I really have no idea what it means for an attribute or element to be in 
>>>>> a "choice". Does it mean at most one is specified or exactly one? What if 
>>>>> I want exactly one in some cases and at most one in others?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ralph
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2014, at 11:53 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> How do I tell my plugin that it can have attribute1 or 2, but not both? 
>>>>>> IOW I want the config framework to do the validation for me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> How about:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> @PluginAttribute(choice="group1") int foo,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> @PluginAttribute(choice="group1") int bar
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Same thing for elements.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action
>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>>> Spring Batch in Action
>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>> Spring Batch in Action
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> Spring Batch in Action
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to