Hmm, I like the annotations for script style stuff, actually. See for
instance what Camel offers in that regard:

http://camel.apache.org/annotation-based-expression-language.html


On 2 June 2014 10:28, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote:

> That is essentially the same thing Matt is doing with his builders.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 2, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't recall Jackson providing a way to specify constraints or default
>>> values.  Does it?
>>>
>>
>> I do not think so, but you an init a non-final field yourself and let
>> Jackson override it as suggested here:
>>
>
>
> http://jackson-users.ning.com/forum/topics/default-value-for-missing-int-property-when-deserializing-json
>
> Gary
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Jun 2, 2014, at 6:19 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not trying to handle all cases under the sun. But... we've chosen
>>> NOT to use an XML Schema based XML IO framework (like JAXB or Jackson),
>>> instead we've invented our own. I know we do JSON as well, but so does
>>> Jackson and it likely also has a plugin for YAML. So now, every time I'm
>>> looking for some minor improvement, it means tweaking our custom framework
>>> or adding boilerplate code to plugins. It's a pain, but that's where we are
>>> today. At least now, with the new type converters, I get the type
>>> conversion from to int for free :-)
>>>
>>> In this case, I meant, you can only use attribute A or B.
>>>
>>> It is probably worth stepping back and looking at the big picture and
>>> whether we want to invest in improving the current config IO framework or
>>> at least consider if Jackson would be a better fit. Likely not for 2.0 ;-)
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you looking for annotations to handle every kind of thing you might
>>>> like to do instead of just putting a couple lines of code in the factory
>>>> method? I would have handled this by saying foo and bar both need to be
>>>> Integer and then adding a line do code that insures exactly one, or at most
>>>> one, is present ( depending on what you want ).
>>>>
>>>> I really have no idea what it means for an attribute or element to be
>>>> in a "choice". Does it mean at most one is specified or exactly one? What
>>>> if I want exactly one in some cases and at most one in others?
>>>>
>>>> Ralph
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 1, 2014, at 11:53 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How do I tell my plugin that it can have attribute1 or 2, but not both?
>>>> IOW I want the config framework to do the validation for me.
>>>>
>>>> How about:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @PluginAttribute(choice="group1") int foo,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @PluginAttribute(choice="group1") int bar
>>>>
>>>> Same thing for elements.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to