It's just a poll, we have to draw the line somewhere and polish and address Jiras for 2.1. I know we operate in what feels sometimes like a free-for-all but it seems appropriate to slow things down a bit before we think of releasing. We also operate in a "do-ocracy" so I do not think any one will stop you from merging if that what you think is best.
Gary On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > The code, tests and docs are ready and I was about to merge the LOG4J2-431 > branch into master. > Why are we having a poll about this appender? What makes it different > from, say, GELFLayout? > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Any thoughts on merging the MMA for 2.1 vs. 2.2? >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
