Updated the JUL component page docs, and added component docs for IOStreams.
On 18 September 2014 12:45, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > Note that JUL and IO Streams are not 100% done: > The JUL component page needs to be updated, > and the IO Streams component does not have a page yet. IOStreams also does > not have a changelog entry yet. > (Is LOG4J2-547 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-547> the > correct Jira for IO Streams? Gary or Matt, can you add a changelog entry?) > > If we are going to do a beta, we need to ensure that users can download > both the 2.0.2 jars and the 2.1-beta jars from the site. > I have no idea how much work it would be to change the site... > > LOG4J2-829 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-829> on the face > of it looks fairly straightforward. If you guys work on the above I can > take care of this one. > LOG4J2-818 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-818> may be > non-trivial and perhaps not feasible for 2.1-beta. > > > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'd rather RERO and keep moving. But the timiing depends on Matt's >> availability to RM a beta and/or release candidate. >> >> I think the path we agreed on is to cut a beta ASAP to put the new >> features (JUL, IO streams, and now MMFA) in the wild. >> >> I'd like to think we are fixing bug or addressing reports as they come up >> but I what it feels like from reading the ML and Jira is that people are >> trickling in reports and comments. So I want to make sure we fix what needs >> to be fixed ASAP, or document, or create FAQ entries... >> >> For example, what should we do about: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-829 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-818 >> >> Gary >> >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> All interesting stuff! >>> Are we targeting this for 2.1? >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Next I'd like to see something to help log hex dumps. I emailed about >>>> this in the last couple of weeks. >>>> >>>> I would also like the start of my logs to start with the same >>>> information "java -version" provides.Separate message coming. >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well, sure, after documenting this appender and testing it on 4 OS'es >>>>> and 8 JVMs I think it is ready to be merged and included in 2.1. >>>>> It doesn't get much more polished than that... :-) >>>>> >>>>> I don't see any reason not to include it so I'll go ahead and merge >>>>> LOG4J2-431 into master. >>>>> >>>>> About polishing and addressing Jiras slated for 2.1, is there anything >>>>> in particular you want me to help with? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, -Remko >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's just a poll, we have to draw the line somewhere and polish and >>>>>> address Jiras for 2.1. I know we operate in what feels sometimes like a >>>>>> free-for-all but it seems appropriate to slow things down a bit before we >>>>>> think of releasing. We also operate in a "do-ocracy" so I do not think >>>>>> any >>>>>> one will stop you from merging if that what you think is best. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gary >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The code, tests and docs are ready and I was about to merge the >>>>>>> LOG4J2-431 branch into master. >>>>>>> Why are we having a poll about this appender? What makes it >>>>>>> different from, say, GELFLayout? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Gary Gregory < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any thoughts on merging the MMA for 2.1 vs. 2.2? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gary >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
