Well, sure, after documenting this appender and testing it on 4 OS'es and 8
JVMs I think it is ready to be merged and included in 2.1.
It doesn't get much more polished than that... :-)

I don't see any reason not to include it so I'll go ahead and merge
LOG4J2-431 into master.

About polishing and addressing Jiras slated for 2.1, is there anything in
particular you want me to help with?

Regards, -Remko


On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
wrote:

> It's just a poll, we have to draw the line somewhere and polish and
> address Jiras for 2.1. I know we operate in what feels sometimes like a
> free-for-all but it seems appropriate to slow things down a bit before we
> think of releasing. We also operate in a "do-ocracy" so I do not think any
> one will stop you from merging if that what you think is best.
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> The code, tests and docs are ready and I was about to merge the
>> LOG4J2-431 branch into master.
>> Why are we having a poll about this appender? What makes it different
>> from, say, GELFLayout?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Any thoughts on merging the MMA for 2.1 vs. 2.2?
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>

Reply via email to