You the man! Very nice! Sent from my iPhone
> On 2014/09/19, at 7:47, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Updated the JUL component page docs, and added component docs for IOStreams. > >> On 18 September 2014 12:45, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: >> Note that JUL and IO Streams are not 100% done: >> The JUL component page needs to be updated, >> and the IO Streams component does not have a page yet. IOStreams also does >> not have a changelog entry yet. >> (Is LOG4J2-547 the correct Jira for IO Streams? Gary or Matt, can you add a >> changelog entry?) >> >> If we are going to do a beta, we need to ensure that users can download both >> the 2.0.2 jars and the 2.1-beta jars from the site. >> I have no idea how much work it would be to change the site... >> >> LOG4J2-829 on the face of it looks fairly straightforward. If you guys work >> on the above I can take care of this one. >> LOG4J2-818 may be non-trivial and perhaps not feasible for 2.1-beta. >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> I'd rather RERO and keep moving. But the timiing depends on Matt's >>> availability to RM a beta and/or release candidate. >>> >>> I think the path we agreed on is to cut a beta ASAP to put the new features >>> (JUL, IO streams, and now MMFA) in the wild. >>> >>> I'd like to think we are fixing bug or addressing reports as they come up >>> but I what it feels like from reading the ML and Jira is that people are >>> trickling in reports and comments. So I want to make sure we fix what needs >>> to be fixed ASAP, or document, or create FAQ entries... >>> >>> For example, what should we do about: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-829 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-818 >>> >>> Gary >>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> All interesting stuff! >>>> Are we targeting this for 2.1? >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> Next I'd like to see something to help log hex dumps. I emailed about >>>>> this in the last couple of weeks. >>>>> >>>>> I would also like the start of my logs to start with the same information >>>>> "java -version" provides.Separate message coming. >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Well, sure, after documenting this appender and testing it on 4 OS'es >>>>>> and 8 JVMs I think it is ready to be merged and included in 2.1. >>>>>> It doesn't get much more polished than that... :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see any reason not to include it so I'll go ahead and merge >>>>>> LOG4J2-431 into master. >>>>>> >>>>>> About polishing and addressing Jiras slated for 2.1, is there anything >>>>>> in particular you want me to help with? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, -Remko >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> It's just a poll, we have to draw the line somewhere and polish and >>>>>>> address Jiras for 2.1. I know we operate in what feels sometimes like a >>>>>>> free-for-all but it seems appropriate to slow things down a bit before >>>>>>> we think of releasing. We also operate in a "do-ocracy" so I do not >>>>>>> think any one will stop you from merging if that what you think is best. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gary >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> The code, tests and docs are ready and I was about to merge the >>>>>>>> LOG4J2-431 branch into master. >>>>>>>> Why are we having a poll about this appender? What makes it different >>>>>>>> from, say, GELFLayout? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Gary Gregory >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on merging the MMA for 2.1 vs. 2.2? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gary >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>> Spring Batch in Action >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
