This is my +1. If this is the incorrect voting format and we need to do a 2/3 majority instead, please veto this and let me know. This situation is not spelled out in the bylaws.
On 7 March 2017 at 22:20, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I may be missing some mailing lists considering I just subscribed to half > of them less than five minutes ago. > > This is a vote to merge the various Apache Logging Services mailing lists. > The proposal is to combine them as follows: > > log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> > d...@logging.apache.org > log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, log4cxx-user@, general@ -> > u...@logging.apache.org > > commits@ and private@ remain the same as before. > > The proposal would also suggest that the old emails become aliases for the > combined email names so as not to lose any future emails. To distinguish > between projects, a subject tag can be added such as: > > [java] > [net] > [cxx] > [php] > > Though I wouldn't think such a tag is required, though it should help in > gaining the attention of the appropriate audience. > > Voting: > > +1: Yes, combine the mailing lists! > +0: Go ahead, don't care that much. > -0: Don't like it, but not vetoing it. > -1: No, don't do that! I have a better idea! > > This vote follows the same "lazy consensus" (at least 3 +1 binding, no > -1/vetoes) we use for general releases and whatnot. The vote will be open > for at least 72 hours. > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
