+1 Note that generally a -1 is a veto only on code commits. On everything else it just means you are against the proposal. However, we generally strive for consensus so great weight is given to binding votes that are opposed.
Ralph > On Mar 7, 2017, at 9:23 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is my +1. > > If this is the incorrect voting format and we need to do a 2/3 majority > instead, please veto this and let me know. This situation is not spelled out > in the bylaws. > > On 7 March 2017 at 22:20, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com > <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > I may be missing some mailing lists considering I just subscribed to half of > them less than five minutes ago. > > This is a vote to merge the various Apache Logging Services mailing lists. > The proposal is to combine them as follows: > > log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> > d...@logging.apache.org <mailto:d...@logging.apache.org> > log4j-user@, log4php-user@, log4net-user@, log4cxx-user@, general@ -> > u...@logging.apache.org <mailto:u...@logging.apache.org> > > commits@ and private@ remain the same as before. > > The proposal would also suggest that the old emails become aliases for the > combined email names so as not to lose any future emails. To distinguish > between projects, a subject tag can be added such as: > > [java] > [net] > [cxx] > [php] > > Though I wouldn't think such a tag is required, though it should help in > gaining the attention of the appropriate audience. > > Voting: > > +1: Yes, combine the mailing lists! > +0: Go ahead, don't care that much. > -0: Don't like it, but not vetoing it. > -1: No, don't do that! I have a better idea! > > This vote follows the same "lazy consensus" (at least 3 +1 binding, no > -1/vetoes) we use for general releases and whatnot. The vote will be open for > at least 72 hours. > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
