My configuration is definitely being used -- I have two appender references (RollingFile and JDBC) under the root logger and events are being written to the file appender.
Unfortunately, setting status="debug" had no effect. That might be because log4j sends those messages to the console and there isn't one for my (GUI) application. Apparently console != stdout here, because my app intercepts data written to stdout/stderr and sends a copy to a logger but nothing is showing up in my file. Is there a logger name for which I can set the logging level instead? Setting -Dlog4j.debug doesn't appear to have any effect either. :( On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:06 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > It feels like your Log4j configuration is not being used. I would: > > - Use the latest version 2.8.2 > - Turn on Log4j debugging in both your config file with status="DEBUG" and > also on the command line with "-Dlog4j.debug=true" (but I think this last > one might only work in 2.9-SNAPSHOT) > > Gary > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Michael Carman < > michael.j.car...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'm having an odd problem and don't know where to look for > troubleshooting > > purposes. > > > > I have an Eclipse RCP application. I'm attempting to transition logging > > from a file to a database (Oracle). When running my application via > Eclipse > > events are logged to the database as expected. When running my > application > > directly (i.e. after building) no log events appear in the database. I'm > > not seeing any (relevant) errors in either my application log or the > > Eclipse log. (My Log4j configuration has both file and database appenders > > defined.) I know that my connection to the database is working because > > other portions of my application make stored procedure calls and they're > > working. > > > > My first thought is that Log4j isn't committing after inserting new data. > > LOG4J2-438 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-438> appears to > > be > > about that exact issue, but it's marked as being fixed in 2.0-rc1; I'm > > running 2.7. Besides, that wouldn't explain why it works when running > under > > Eclipse. > > > > Does anyone have any ideas about what might be wrong? > > > > -Mike > > >