Há um "velho" livro de Stephen Toulmin intitulado "Na examination of the place of reason in ethics" (Cambridge University Press, 1960). Cifuentes
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Livre de vírus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>. <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> 2017-06-10 19:53 GMT-03:00 Marcos Silva <[email protected]>: > caros, > > há alguns bons meses circulei uns emails em listas de filosofia e logica > para tentar receber indicações bibliográficas a respeito de uma relação > pouco explorada, mas, em minha opinião, seminal entre lógica e ética. > > a minha investigação foi motivada em parte por uma frase frequentemente > atribuída a peirce, 'lógica é a ética do pensamento' e em outra parte, por > uma tentativa recorrente minha de pensar a natureza da normatividade da > razão no difícil contexto do pluralismo lógico. > > para quem tiver curiosidade, abaixo está uma lista de respostas (muito > boas) que recebi. > > acho que, com a devida 'open-mindness' e diligência, elas podem > representar bons pontos de partida para futuros projetos. > > abraços, > marcos > > ++++ > > Dear Professor Silva, > > At the moment at least, I cannot locate any passage where Peirce would > have used exactly the words you cited. That line ("Logic is the ethics of > thinking") is found in T. L. Short’s book on Peirce’s theory of signs, but > I suspect that what you have in mind is a statement that Frank Ramsey > reportedly attributed to Peirce (“logic is the ethics of thinking, in the > sense in which ethics is the bringing to bear of self-control for the > purpose of realizing our desires”). I. A Richards mentions it in a couple > of places, but without providing a source. I has occasionally been repeated > in the literature – attributed to Peirce, but again without citing the > original source. > > As far as I can tell, it is a paraphrase rather than a direct quote – but > it is quite possible that the exact phrase can be found in somewhere > Peirce’s vast corpus, much of which has not been published. In any case, > the following quotes (especially the second, from an unpublished > manuscript) capture the sentiment: > > > > · Logic is the theory of self-controlled, or deliberate, thought; > and as such, must appeal to ethics for its principles. It also depends upon > phenomenology and upon mathematics. All thought being performed by means of > signs, logic may be regarded as the science of the general laws of signs. > (Syllabus of a course of Lectures at the Lowell Institute, EP 2:260) > > > > · The purpose and utility of logic […] lies in its final > achievement of a methodeutic for the guidance of thought; and from this > point of view logic is the theory of the self-control of thought in order > to realize its intention, which is truth. So regarded, logic may be called > a special kind of ethics, if by ethics we mean the theory of the > self-control of conduct in order to realize a deliberately adopted purpose. > For inquiry is only a particular kind of conduct. (On Classification of the > Sciences, MS 602:8) > > > > I copied these from the on-line Peirce quotation dictionary that I am > compiling; you will find it here: http://www.commens.org/dictionary. > > > > I hope this is of help. > > > > Kind regards, > > Mats Bergman > > University of Helsinki > > > > ++++ > > > [...] > > > > Quaisquer sugestões de textos acerca deste tópico entre ligações entre > > lógica e moral são bem-vindas também. > > Você provavelmente já conhece, mas talvez valha a pena lembrar: > > https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/analytica/article/viewFile/528/483 > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/dwwkm1gf4fezypy/poggianipeirces_normative_ > foundation_of_logic2012.pdf?dl=0 > > Hermógenes Oliveira > > ++++ > > > > Dear Marcus, > > > > This phrase occurs in Husserl's Logical Investigations, vol 1, pg 43. "He > [the logician] aims not at a physics, but an ethics of thinking." The first > three chapters of LI are much concerned with the idea of logic as a > normative science, which be of use for your project. > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/a8ztwpusol7qdb2/Husserl_-_ > Logical_Investigations%2C_Vol._I1901.pdf?dl=0 > > > > Best Regards, > > > > -- > > Tudor Protopopescu > > > > ++++ > > > > Hi Marcos > > > > Arthur Prior’s book (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956) is a good place to > start for relevant reading on the general topic. > > > > All the best, > > Paul Coates > > > > ++++ > > > > Dear Marcos, > > The exact reference for the sentence you quoted is page 63 of T.L. Short., > 2007. *Peirce's Theory of Signs*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. > As far as I know, Peirce did not wrote "Logic is the ethics of thinking" > but, to be sure, he conveyed something akin in *The Essential Peirce* Vol > 2, page 42: "For if, as pragmatism teaches us, what we think is to be > interpreted in terms of what we are prepared to do, then surely logic, or > the doctrine of what we ought to think, must be an application of the > doctrine of what we deliberately choose to do, which is Ethics." > > Best regards, > > Jaime *Alfaro Iglesias* > > > > *++++* > > > > Dear Marcos, > > > > I received your email to PHILOS-L. I am working on my thesis about reasons > for action. However, naturally these debates take me to questions about > reasons in general too. One paper came to my mind regarding logic. Attached > you may find it. I enjoyed reading it. Hope it be useful. > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/8gv5iclvja46qja/CorcoranInseparability%20of% > 20logic%20and%20ethics%201989.pdf?dl=0 > > > > Yours, > > Seyyed Ardakani > > > > > 2017-02-18 13:16 GMT-03:00 Marcos Silva <[email protected]>: > >> Caros, >> >> alguém poderia me indicar as referências exatas de texto do Peirce onde >> ele afirma, se é que afirmou mesmo, que "logic is the ethics of thinking"? >> >> Se as referências viessem com o texto propriamente dito em alguma versão >> pdf ficaria ainda mais grato. :-) >> >> ++++ >> >> Quaisquer sugestões de textos acerca deste tópico entre ligações entre >> lógica e moral são bem-vindas também. >> >> A competente entrada recente do steinberger na sep ( >> https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-normative/) é um dos meus >> pontos de partida para esta temática. >> >> Tô tentando elaborar um projeto de pesquisa conectando discussões sobre >> normatividade e pluralismo lógico. >> >> Abraços, >> Marcos >> >> -- >> Marcos Silva >> https://sites.google.com/site/marcossilvarj/ >> Philosophie macht Spaß! >> >> > > > -- > Marcos Silva > https://sites.google.com/site/marcossilvarj/ > Philosophie macht Spaß! > > -- > Você recebeu essa mensagem porque está inscrito no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos > Grupos do Google. > Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie > um e-mail para [email protected]. > Para postar nesse grupo, envie um e-mail para [email protected]. > Acesse esse grupo em https://groups.google.com/a/ > dimap.ufrn.br/group/logica-l/. > Para ver essa discussão na Web, acesse https://groups.google.com/a/ > dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAGZ3pzKVYDqSJugxErnLjWfWGauq9 > %2BxfjtaskbkddyT7OXQm%3DA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAGZ3pzKVYDqSJugxErnLjWfWGauq9%2BxfjtaskbkddyT7OXQm%3DA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos Grupos do Google. Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um e-mail para [email protected]. Para postar neste grupo, envie um e-mail para [email protected]. Visite este grupo em https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/group/logica-l/. Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAEQwYASJmKsUgg9a6cSZuYxrDoKEDmOYK3ywu7ZAaQQkJZkekA%40mail.gmail.com.
