On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I vaguely recall it standing for something like "Heuristic Algorithmic > Logic," but that doesn't really set it apart from anything. how does that explain SAL9000? MBM -- Matthew Byng-Maddick Home: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +44 20 8980 5714 (Home) http://colondot.net/ Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +44 7956 613942 (Mobile) Trifles make perfection, and perfection is no trifle. -- Michelangelo
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Lucy McWilliam
- HAL (was: ISO8601 (was: Pointless, B... Robin Houston
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... Dave Cross
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... Robin Szemeti
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Tony Bowden
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Jon Eyre
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Dave Cross
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... pmh
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Redvers Davies
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... David H. Adler
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Paul Makepeace
- RE: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Andrew Bowman
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Piers Cawley
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Simon Cozens
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
