Jonathan Peterson sent the following bits through the ether: > :) I was thinking of EJB, specifically. Once you put a load of logic into > beans, it seems damned hard to use them without the rest of the Java based > infrastructure. Indeed. Since Emap was moving to EJB (and Java everywhere), I considered investigating interfacing to beans from Perl using Java.pm or Inline::Java. I didn't actually have any time to do this, but I don't see why it shouldn't be possible. I reckon interperability is big, and that XML-RPC (or possibly even SOAP) will change the way we work. There's no point writing everything in one language or environment any more. Microsoft may have understood this with .NET. Discuss. Leon -- Leon Brocard.............................http://www.astray.com/ yapc::Europe............................http://yapc.org/Europe/ ... With a rubber duck, one's never alone
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Tony Bowden
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. David H. Adler
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Chris Devers
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Simon Cozens
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Chris Devers
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Greg McCarroll
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Mark Fowler
- RE: Job: I'm looking for one.. Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Leon Brocard
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Dominic Mitchell
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Paul Makepeace
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Greg McCarroll
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Dean S Wilson
- JOB: non-london Robin Szemeti
- RE: Job: I'm looking for one.. Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Philip Newton
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Philip Newton
- RE: Job: I'm looking for one.. Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Job: I'm looking for one.. Dave Cross