On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:59:53PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > Paul Makepeace wrote: > > The -> to . conversion [...] will be a wonderful thing. > > To be honest, I never understood the point of that conversion. Is it an > attempt to make Perl look more like VB? Or like Java? Or trying to save > keystrokes? Simplify the lexer? *tokes hard* _fewer characters, man!_ -> makes my right wrist click since I never got the hang of the left shift key in a general way. It just looks... nicer. </imo> Paul
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Piers Cawley
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] David Cantrell
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis ... David Cantrell
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exege... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exege... Robin Szemeti
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's ... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis ... Chris Devers
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Damian Conway
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Philip Newton
- Paul Makepeace