Now I'm not buying into the argument on either side, but it does remind
me of a lovely quote by Australian programming legend Alan Kennington:
Eiffel is some sort of avant-garde French computing
movement which believes that programming is reactionary
and oppressive. Instead, they see the future of computing
as lying in broad strokes of the mouse to communicate
the software developer's creative desires. The Eiffel
system then writes a program for the computing artist.
As is typical of French ideas, Eiffel appeals to those
sections of the middle class eho can't remember what
work was like, and don't particularly want to be reminded.
;-)
Damian
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Mark Fowler
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Greg McCarroll
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Piers Cawley
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] David Cantrell
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis ... David Cantrell
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exege... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exege... Robin Szemeti
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's ... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis ... Chris Devers
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Damian Conway
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Philip Newton
- Re: [[email protected]: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Paul Makepeace
