|
I wrote in a earlier message that I want to wait until more members
for the committee are on board. You, Gregg, wrote that you believed
that there is a neeed for more minds working together, I firmly believe with
that. That is the first order of business at this
point. jal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:20
PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Record your vote, John, so we can at least make
some kind of progress? Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:14
PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Gregg I believe you are intelligent enough to easily understadn
my poor grammer. My grammer has never been better in my 56 yrs,
than it is right now. Don't make it a problem.
jal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:49
PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
No, I've responded to hundreds of
messages. You should think about principles & priorities (&
grammar) if you want to be taken seriously.
Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
1:42 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Gregg I sent you a number of communications
specificly asking you to make a responce. That doesn't mean
a insult. When I sent the first message to you
saying that I did notn like your draft, that was not a insult that was a
shor and to the point message and I expected that you would discuss the
reasons with the whole group. You made no reply to the group
or to me. That is not taking a part in a
discussion. I can understand that you may have taken that
personally and gotten you feeling hurt. I believed that we
had a better sypathic channel of communication, and, I could just send
that message to you, and you would understand it to indicate that I
wished to talk it over with you. I believe that had we all
been sitting at the same table you would ahve understood my
intentions. Since you did not reply to that communication
and the several others, I did not know what to
believe. jal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
It means that I've been part of the group
from its inception, so why are you making this charge against
me? Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
What is that supposed to mean?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12,
2003 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Hey, John, wake up! Part of the
group? Get a grip! Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 11,
2003 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
The problem I have with Gregg is that he has not responded
to being part of the group in the past. This is not
a indication that I don't like Gregg, don't take it personally,
we need to interact. I realize that the lack of
leadship from Vance, Steves defection and detractions of our
lives has caused this. I do believe we need a couple
more members of this group, who are truly
interested. I'm not really saying Nay at
this time.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 11,
2003 10:43 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
I vote yay for Gregg being the
chair of the committee.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March
11, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Well,
do you want me to chair the committee until we get a
finished platform, maybe in a few months, & then when
that first stage is done, have the next spring chicken
handle whatever seems to be the next step?
Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March
11, 2003 8:47 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Hi Gregg I hope your family
is doing okay now. Some of us tend to get impatient with
one another. Like I said before I do not know what
caused the outburst over "abortion" I just know that it
happened. I don't have a problem with what your Platform
states I said though b/c it caused such outcry that it
might be wise to "chuck" that part of it is all.
The following is the actual
word's of the platform. Please do not read your "old"
Platforms. National has revised the Platform over the last
year and you need to get your Platform info from the
Platform online site.
Now we are supposed to
discuss this among ourselves.Yes we need someone to
head the committee. Who will it be...I personally don't
know how to write a Platform. I do know though how to keep
thing's on track & keep us productive. Remember
with Convention & raising fund's I have a full plate
already. And on weekends I cannot get back with you. I
work all weekend starting on Friday. So lets pick someone
& be on our way guy's....
I know we don't want to
ignore the issues but we need to be vague. That way
candidates don't get stuck with something twisted. I liked
Greggs Platform & didn't see anything wrong with it. I
suggested we take out the word abortion is all. Just to
stay on the safe side of the controversy.
Now I want to say
something-recently I found out that National will be
holding convention & electing someone to be "a
presidential candidate" if this is the case. I hope to
encourage full support of the candidate & that we pour
our energy into getting this candidate elected. This is
our ultimate goal, not your house of representative,
senator, congressman. So what does the LPCO do in
presidential election years????
Thanks,
Dana
Nationals Platform:.
Individual Rights and Civil Order
Women's Rights and Abortion
We hold that individual rights should not be denied or
abridged on the basis of sex. We call for repeal of all
laws discriminating against women, such as protective
labor laws and marriage or divorce laws which deny the
full rights of men and women. We oppose all laws likely to
impose restrictions on free choice and private property or
to widen tyranny through reverse discrimination.
Recognizing that abortion is a very sensitive issue and
that people, including libertarians, can hold good-faith
views on both sides, we believe the government should be
kept out of the question.
We condemn state-funded and state-mandated abortions.
It is particularly harsh to force someone who believes
that abortion is murder to pay for another's abortion.
It is the right and obligation of the pregnant woman,
not the state, to decide the desirability or
appropriateness of prenatal testing, Caesarean births,
fetal surgery, voluntary surrogacy arrangements, and/or
home births.
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Monday, March
10, 2003 1:11 PM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Dana, National deals with
the issue. I believe that we must in some way deal
with all Colorado issues. We may find ways to
improve positions, but we should not ignore
any. Gregg
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Wednesday,
March 05, 2003 9:06 AM
Subject:
Hey!!!!
Where is the committee?
Are we going to ignore eachother or what?
John, Gregg, Paul -Are
you all there? How about dropping the abortion word
out of the Health part of the Platform??? I vote yay
to remove the word.
Thanks,
Dana
|
