|
I had sent meassages to Norm, suggesting the need for more
members. I don't know what happened with that, prob. nothing,
typical of the leadership vaccum of the BoD.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:36
PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Well if this is the case that more members are
wanted- then I suggest it be put on a back burner until such time that you
have others interested. That whats I suggested at first. To hold off & get
your extra members at convention.
Now so what the h*ll is the deal? Don't keep
me hanging guys!!!
Dana
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:30
PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
I wrote in a earlier message that I want to wait until more
members for the committee are on board. You, Gregg, wrote that
you believed that there is a neeed for more minds working together, I firmly
believe with that. That is the first order of business at
this point. jal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:20
PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Record your vote, John, so we can at least
make some kind of progress? Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Gregg I believe you are intelligent enough to easily
understadn my poor grammer. My grammer has never been better
in my 56 yrs, than it is right now. Don't make it a
problem. jal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
No, I've responded to hundreds of
messages. You should think about principles & priorities
(& grammar) if you want to be taken seriously.
Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
1:42 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Gregg I sent you a number of communications
specificly asking you to make a responce. That doesn't
mean a insult. When I sent the first message
to you saying that I did notn like your draft, that was not a insult
that was a shor and to the point message and I expected that you
would discuss the reasons with the whole group. You made
no reply to the group or to me. That is not taking a
part in a discussion. I can understand that you may have
taken that personally and gotten you feeling hurt. I
believed that we had a better sypathic channel of communication,
and, I could just send that message to you, and you would
understand it to indicate that I wished to talk it over with
you. I believe that had we all been sitting at the same
table you would ahve understood my intentions. Since you
did not reply to that communication and the several others, I did
not know what to believe. jal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12,
2003 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
It means that I've been part of the
group from its inception, so why are you making this charge
against me? Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12,
2003 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
What is that supposed to mean?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March
12, 2003 1:01 PM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Hey, John, wake up! Part of
the group? Get a grip!
Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March
11, 2003 11:07 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
The problem I have with Gregg is that he has not
responded to being part of the group in the
past. This is not a indication that I don't like
Gregg, don't take it personally, we need to
interact. I realize that the lack of leadship
from Vance, Steves defection and detractions of our lives
has caused this. I do believe we need a couple
more members of this group, who are truly
interested. I'm not really saying Nay
at this time.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March
11, 2003 10:43 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
I vote yay for Gregg being
the chair of the committee.
Dana
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Tuesday,
March 11, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Well, do you want me to chair the committee until we get
a finished platform, maybe in a few months, & then
when that first stage is done, have the next spring
chicken handle whatever seems to be the next
step? Gregg
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Tuesday,
March 11, 2003 8:47 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Hi Gregg I hope your
family is doing okay now. Some of us tend to get
impatient with one another. Like I said before I
do not know what caused the outburst over "abortion" I
just know that it happened. I don't have a problem
with what your Platform states I said though b/c it
caused such outcry that it might be wise to "chuck"
that part of it is all.
The following is the
actual word's of the platform. Please do not read your
"old" Platforms. National has revised the Platform
over the last year and you need to get your Platform
info from the Platform online site.
Now we are supposed to
discuss this among ourselves.Yes we need someone
to head the committee. Who will it be...I personally
don't know how to write a Platform. I do know though
how to keep thing's on track & keep us
productive. Remember with Convention &
raising fund's I have a full plate already. And on
weekends I cannot get back with you. I work all
weekend starting on Friday. So lets pick someone &
be on our way guy's....
I know we don't want to
ignore the issues but we need to be vague. That way
candidates don't get stuck with something twisted. I
liked Greggs Platform & didn't see anything wrong
with it. I suggested we take out the word abortion is
all. Just to stay on the safe side of the
controversy.
Now I want to say
something-recently I found out that National will be
holding convention & electing someone to be "a
presidential candidate" if this is the case. I hope to
encourage full support of the candidate & that we
pour our energy into getting this candidate elected.
This is our ultimate goal, not your house of
representative, senator, congressman. So what does the
LPCO do in presidential election
years????
Thanks,
Dana
Nationals Platform:.
Individual Rights and Civil Order
Women's Rights and Abortion
We hold that individual rights should not be denied
or abridged on the basis of sex. We call for repeal of
all laws discriminating against women, such as
protective labor laws and marriage or divorce laws
which deny the full rights of men and women. We oppose
all laws likely to impose restrictions on free choice
and private property or to widen tyranny through
reverse discrimination.
Recognizing that abortion is a very sensitive issue
and that people, including libertarians, can hold
good-faith views on both sides, we believe the
government should be kept out of the question.
We condemn state-funded and state-mandated
abortions. It is particularly harsh to force someone
who believes that abortion is murder to pay for
another's abortion.
It is the right and obligation of the pregnant
woman, not the state, to decide the desirability or
appropriateness of prenatal testing, Caesarean births,
fetal surgery, voluntary surrogacy arrangements,
and/or home births.
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Monday,
March 10, 2003 1:11 PM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Dana, National deals
with the issue. I believe that we must in some
way deal with all Colorado issues. We may find
ways to improve positions, but we should not ignore
any. Gregg
----- Original
Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:06 AM
Subject:
Hey!!!!
Where is the
committee? Are we going to ignore eachother or
what?
John, Gregg, Paul
-Are you all there? How about dropping the
abortion word out of the Health part of the
Platform??? I vote yay to remove the
word.
Thanks,
Dana
|
