|
Well if this is the case that more members are
wanted- then I suggest it be put on a back burner until such time that you have
others interested. That whats I suggested at first. To hold off & get your
extra members at convention.
Now so what the h*ll is the deal? Don't keep
me hanging guys!!!
Dana
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:30
PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
I wrote in a earlier message that I want to wait until more
members for the committee are on board. You, Gregg, wrote that you
believed that there is a neeed for more minds working together, I firmly
believe with that. That is the first order of business at
this point. jal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:20
PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Record your vote, John, so we can at least make
some kind of progress? Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:14
PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Gregg I believe you are intelligent enough to easily understadn
my poor grammer. My grammer has never been better in my 56
yrs, than it is right now. Don't make it a
problem. jal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
No, I've responded to hundreds of
messages. You should think about principles & priorities
(& grammar) if you want to be taken seriously.
Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
1:42 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Gregg I sent you a number of communications
specificly asking you to make a responce. That doesn't
mean a insult. When I sent the first message
to you saying that I did notn like your draft, that was not a insult
that was a shor and to the point message and I expected that you would
discuss the reasons with the whole group. You made no
reply to the group or to me. That is not taking a part in
a discussion. I can understand that you may have taken
that personally and gotten you feeling hurt. I believed
that we had a better sypathic channel of communication, and, I could
just send that message to you, and you would understand it to
indicate that I wished to talk it over with you. I believe
that had we all been sitting at the same table you would ahve
understood my intentions. Since you did not reply to that
communication and the several others, I did not know what to
believe. jal
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003
1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
It means that I've been part of the
group from its inception, so why are you making this charge against
me? Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12,
2003 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
What is that supposed to mean?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 12,
2003 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!!!!
Hey, John, wake up! Part of
the group? Get a grip!
Gregg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 11,
2003 11:07 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
The problem I have with Gregg is that he has not
responded to being part of the group in the past.
This is not a indication that I don't like Gregg, don't take
it personally, we need to interact. I realize that
the lack of leadship from Vance, Steves defection and
detractions of our lives has caused this. I do
believe we need a couple more members of this group, who are
truly interested. I'm not really saying
Nay at this time.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March
11, 2003 10:43 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
I vote yay for Gregg being the
chair of the committee.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March
11, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Well, do you want me to chair the committee until we get a
finished platform, maybe in a few months, & then when
that first stage is done, have the next spring chicken
handle whatever seems to be the next
step? Gregg
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Tuesday,
March 11, 2003 8:47 AM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Hi Gregg I hope your family
is doing okay now. Some of us tend to get impatient with
one another. Like I said before I do not know what
caused the outburst over "abortion" I just know that it
happened. I don't have a problem with what your Platform
states I said though b/c it caused such outcry that it
might be wise to "chuck" that part of it is all.
The following is the actual
word's of the platform. Please do not read your "old"
Platforms. National has revised the Platform over the
last year and you need to get your Platform info from
the Platform online site.
Now we are supposed to
discuss this among ourselves.Yes we need someone to
head the committee. Who will it be...I personally don't
know how to write a Platform. I do know though how to
keep thing's on track & keep us productive.
Remember with Convention & raising fund's I have a
full plate already. And on weekends I cannot get back
with you. I work all weekend starting on Friday. So lets
pick someone & be on our way guy's....
I know we don't want to
ignore the issues but we need to be vague. That way
candidates don't get stuck with something twisted. I
liked Greggs Platform & didn't see anything wrong
with it. I suggested we take out the word abortion is
all. Just to stay on the safe side of the
controversy.
Now I want to say
something-recently I found out that National will be
holding convention & electing someone to be "a
presidential candidate" if this is the case. I hope to
encourage full support of the candidate & that we
pour our energy into getting this candidate elected.
This is our ultimate goal, not your house of
representative, senator, congressman. So what does the
LPCO do in presidential election years????
Thanks,
Dana
Nationals Platform:.
Individual Rights and Civil Order
Women's Rights and Abortion
We hold that individual rights should not be denied
or abridged on the basis of sex. We call for repeal of
all laws discriminating against women, such as
protective labor laws and marriage or divorce laws which
deny the full rights of men and women. We oppose all
laws likely to impose restrictions on free choice and
private property or to widen tyranny through reverse
discrimination.
Recognizing that abortion is a very sensitive issue
and that people, including libertarians, can hold
good-faith views on both sides, we believe the
government should be kept out of the question.
We condemn state-funded and state-mandated abortions.
It is particularly harsh to force someone who believes
that abortion is murder to pay for another's abortion.
It is the right and obligation of the pregnant woman,
not the state, to decide the desirability or
appropriateness of prenatal testing, Caesarean births,
fetal surgery, voluntary surrogacy arrangements, and/or
home births.
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Monday,
March 10, 2003 1:11 PM
Subject: Re:
Hey!!!!
Dana, National deals with
the issue. I believe that we must in some way
deal with all Colorado issues. We may find ways
to improve positions, but we should not ignore
any. Gregg
----- Original Message
-----
Sent:
Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:06 AM
Subject:
Hey!!!!
Where is the committee?
Are we going to ignore eachother or what?
John, Gregg, Paul -Are
you all there? How about dropping the abortion word
out of the Health part of the Platform??? I vote yay
to remove the word.
Thanks,
Dana
|
