Dnia 05 Dec 2006 10:51:02 -0500 "G. Matthew Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisal(a||e)s:
> You share that opinion with most of the techies. And you'll be happy > to hear that this opinion was listened to by the LPI execs. It isn't > official (well, nothing LPIC-3 related is "official" yet) but it's > looking like the 301 exam will be the core exam and the 302 (that ol' > Samba exam) will be a specialty topic. I'm glad to hear that. I believe that people who are in charge here (I know community and so on... but I'm sure that there is some group of people who have more to say than anybody else) are reasonable and if many people think the same way I am, they will consider changing their mind. > Also, I'm pushing for, at the LPIC-3 level, a recertification option > similar to other non-profit based certifications like the PMP and > CISSP: (...) Hmm, good idea. Although I will vote to make it this way (if there will be any voting :> ), I'm still ready to take some addional special exam to recertify. -- Best regards, Slawomir Kawala JID: slwkk [at] alternatywa [dot] net GSM: (0)601-398-348 _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
