Etienne Goyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree.  Samba is widely used indeed, but I see Linux mostly
> deployed as an "Internet" platform (web, mail, etc) and low-level
> network functions (firewall, VPN, etc).  By your logic, why not
> make a mandatory exam on these subjects too then ?

Two things:  

1.  We're *NOT* talking about general level 1 or level 2 anymore,
we're talking level 3.  It's not "what you want to deal with on a
single server," but "this is what enterprise expect out of a
seasoned, _enterprise_ Linux administrator of 5+ years experience."

2.  Who's pushing for LPIC-3?  Industry.  Who is industry?  55% of
exam revenues are from Japan.  Japan (e.g., the "six sisters") are
heavily deploying Linux in the _data_center_.  That means you aren't
just dealing with SOHO networking concepts or single, standalone
web/file servers.

You have to worry about distributed authentication, single sign-on
(SSO), network naming and objects, network credentials and exchange,
non-repudiation and -- gasp -- no longer just DAC (Discretionary
Access Controls) but _real_ MAC/RBAC (Mandatory Access Controls /
Role-Based Access Controls).  And yes, like it or not, SELinux
knowledge is a *HUGE* request.

Not the "fun" stuff anymore kiddies.
_Real_ enterprise knowledge.

Don't agree?  At what point do you or do you not want LPIC-3 to be an
"enterprise" cert that enterprise corporations value?  Or you just
want LPIC-3 to be "oh, I work on standalone Internet servers."  Given
the pay I make in the former versus most who work in the latter,
sorry, the focus is right where I think it should be.

Wouldn't you like to join some of us in that latter 3%?  ;->

> Also, I believe that Samba is very much a specialization.  The
> skillset required for Samba administration is very specific to this
> task, and not generally useful.  I would rather see core exam being
> about generally useful stuff such as advanced networking, security,
> etc.

There are currently (IIRc) six (6) planned level 3 exams.
Samba and LPIC are the first two (2).
You can be damned sure "security" is in there.  ;->

No offense, but LPIC-3 is about "put up or shut up."  If you want to
"put up," Matt will be glad to have you help -- heck -- even _lead_
the task analysis for another, future level 3 exam!

But understand that you aren't going to always agree with the focus. 
E.g., many people balk at SELinux, but it's going to be tackled,
because industry wants that knowledge tested.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith   Professional, Technical Annoyance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://thebs413.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------
     Fission Power:  An Inconvenient Solution
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss

Reply via email to