Ryan McCain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I may have joined this game late, but when is the LPIC 3 due out? > Is there anything I can do to assist in the development of the > exam?
Contact Matt. He has all your answers (and can always use volunteers). That goes for everyone, including myself (as I've wasted a good 6-7 hours responding and blogging), when we could have channeled these hours to Matt and helping LPIC-3 developments. This will be my last post as I've abused the list's time as well. At least read my blogs if you want to know more about LPI, the [S]AC, the TAC and what makes it different. You're free to assume I'm a fool or an "LPI apologist" if you want afterwards, but at least read my two blog entries. http://thebs413.blogspot.com/2006/04/business-of-linuxworld.html http://thebs413.blogspot.com/2006/12/lpi-reiterates-and-updates.html -- Bryan P.S. A good example of people who don't read or stop to read standards, and listen way too much to vendor-specific marketing than _real_ industry knowledge and expertise: The original IEEE 802.11g specification is only designed and tested (and still only rated in many capabilities) for 22Mbps, *NOT* 54Mbps! Although data values were eventually added so different vendor 54Mbps, aka "54G", didn't stomp on one another and worked together. People were shocked and dismayed (espeically /., God help us with that bucket of mass ignorance! ;-) when it was announced as a 22Mbps max rate. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
