Mark Scholten wrote:

> I would prefer it to include multiple editors. Eg the 5 most used.

I think this would be a singularly unproductive idea, for the following 
reasons:

  – Right now people are forced to learn at most one editor they don't like
    (namely vi). With this approach it is virtually guaranteed that everyone
    will have to learn four editors they don't like.

  – Right now the exam has 3 questions on vi. If we were to cover more
    editors, it stands to reason that the number of questions on text editing
    would have to be increased to be commensurate with the time people have
    to spend on learning the topic, but we don't really have questions to
    spare. If anything, the number of questions on vi should be *decreased*
    in order to be able to ask more questions on more important topics.

  – We have been fighting hard to reduce the number of objectives on the
    exams that are basically kitchen-sink type lists of various programs
    that all do more or less the same thing, and which were at some point
    added simply because whoever was in charge at that time didn't want to
    piss people off by excluding their favourite piece of software. For
    example, LPIC-2 used to cover, at some depth, four different MTAs
    (Sendmail, Postfix, Exim and Qmail), but we managed to bring that down to
    Postfix plus some Sendmail plus knowing that Exim and Qmail exist. It is
    reasonable to say that if you have studied one MTA in detail it will
    not be too difficult to transfer that knowledge to other MTAs. 

    In the same spirit, what is important to most people as far as editors
    are concerned is muscle memory, and it's simply not worth the trouble
    to ask questions on a whole bouquet of different editors that nobody will
    all be using at the same time, anyway. People can get by with at most two
    editors, namely their favourite editor and vi, and it is reasonable to
    require some vi on the exam if we must, but we can't cover everyone's
    favourite non-vi editor or even the four most popular of those (by
    whose count, anyway?), too.

Anselm
-- 
Anselm Lingnau  …  Linup Front GmbH (MAX21)  … Linux- & Open-Source-Schulungen
anselm.ling...@linupfront.de,   +49(0)6151-9067-0, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de
Robert-Koch-Str. 9, 64331 Weiterstadt  Post: Postf. 100121, 64201 Darmstadt DE
Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705) Geschf: Oliver Michel, Nils Manegold
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss

Reply via email to