Dear all, before removing the 'draft' status from the 305 objectives page ( https://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-305_Objectives_V3.0), what do you think about the current relevance of Xen (weight: 4) and Qemu (weight: 6) compared to Kubernetes (currently contained in a weight 2 objective). To me it seems that Xen becomes less and less relevant while Qemu/KVM is almost entirely used through other means (libvirt, proxmox, ...), so testing their specific options and configuration knobs might be arguable.
On the other hand, Docker is more and more used through Kubernetes. Currently we just cover the overall concepts of Kubernetes. What if we would reduce the weights of Xen and Qemu to 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 respectively to just cover the architecture in order to free up 5 to 7 weight points which we could spend on Kubernetes instead? We could create another objective about understanding the architecture of Kubernetes, set up a Kubernetes cluster through kubeadm and understand the roles and functions of the most important Kubernetes objects (pods, replicasets, deployments, daemonsets, services, ingress). I wouldn't test creating and managing these objects since that would be more related to the DevOps certification, but cover enough for a kubernetes node admin to understand what their users are doing. Let me know your thoughts :) Fabian
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
