On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:00:11PM +0100, Markus Schade wrote: > I am not ertain that the future of Docker Inc. is tied to the future of > docker. Nevertheless, I have to agree that since Redhat is throwing all > its weight behind podman, it will most likely become the de-facto > standard. So we could add some podman/buildah/skopeo questions. > > I am not so sure whether to further offset the balance between Xen and > Qemu than already planned (we are coming from a 50:50 split and much > higher weight). I may have seen little Xen use lately, but I think > reports of its death are premature. > > Kubernetes is a quite complex (and fast changing) piece of software. > So I would further expand on it on this revision. > As Dirk put it. At some point we have to start writing questions. > I am fine with reducing Xen by one point and introducing podman on an > awareness level. Maybe a bit more if we deduct a point from LXD.
Certainly as far as I have understood it, kubernetes manages docker containers, so given how popular kubernetes seems to be, docker isn't going away. docker swarms and other management bits that docker inc has on the other hand seem to be dying out. Perhaps this is why the docker engine is now named docker-moby rather than just docker to try and avoid the confusion a bit. Not sure it is working. -- Len Sorensen _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
