On Fri, 25 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] blurted out:
>On Fri, 25 May 2001, David A. Bandel wrote:
>> Chuck Mead wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> > DAB> Services
>> > DAB> DNS
>> > DAB> httpd
>> > DAB> FTP
>> > DAB> INN
>> > DAB> SMTP
>> > DAB> MTAs
>> > DAB> list managers
>> > DAB> MDAs
>> > DAB> NIS
>> > DAB> NFS
>> > DAB> LDAP
>> > DAB> SNMP
>> > DAB> kerberos
>> > DAB>
>> [snip]
>> > Hey Dave... is Samba a "service" we should require knowledge of at this
>> > level?
>>
>> My personal take is absolutely. I only know of one all Linux/Unix shop,
>> the rest have at least some Windows, and most are almost all Windows
>> with a few file/print servers, other servers (mail, DNS, DHCP) as
>> Linux. Also begs the question if Netware integration should be covered
>> here.
>>
>Well, whether or not to cover samba really isn't an appropriate discussion
>right now, as all the tasks successfully passed the Level 2 job analysis
>:-)
>
>Don't I know how to kill an argument :-)
No an argument... is samba supposed to be included or not?
--
csm
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
