On Fri, 25 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] blurted out: > >On Fri, 25 May 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: > >> >Well, whether or not to cover samba really isn't an appropriate discussion >> >right now, as all the tasks successfully passed the Level 2 job analysis >> >:-) >> > >> >Don't I know how to kill an argument :-) >> >> No an argument... is samba supposed to be included or not? >> >Aha! So I'm not awake yet, and misread the intent of the question. Yes, >samba is included in the 3.12.* lines. It was missing from Dave's compilation which is why I brought it up... :-) -- csm -- This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list. Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to leave the list.
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Chuck Mead
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Les Bell
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Richard Sharpe
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 kara
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Chuck Mead
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Richard Sharpe
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 kara
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Chuck Mead
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Chuck Mead
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Martin . Gwerder
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 kara
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Alan Mead
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Richard Sharpe
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Richard Sharpe
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
