Chuck Mead wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2001, Richard Sharpe blurted out:
>
> RS>At 10:54 AM 5/25/01 -0400, Chuck Mead wrote:
> RS>>>Don't I know how to kill an argument :-)
> RS>>
> RS>>No an argument... is samba supposed to be included or not?
> RS>
> RS>Well, if you look through the list, you will find that Samba is definitely
> RS>included:-)
>
> Not in what Dave sent it wasn't... which accounts for why I asked. :-)
I was more interested in the basic categories. Samba is a subcategory
(would be under services as I see it). Not every single line item is
accounted for, but from the draft (which I expect will change) it is a
starting point.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
--
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Les Bell
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Richard Sharpe
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 kara
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Chuck Mead
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Richard Sharpe
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 kara
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Chuck Mead
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Chuck Mead
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Martin . Gwerder
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 kara
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Alan Mead
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Richard Sharpe
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Richard Sharpe
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 David A. Bandel
- Re: Sorting Categories for Level 2 Martin . Gwerder
