On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 16:25, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> IMO it's more important that we follow the Linux Standard Base spec
> than the release schedules of any specific tool(s) or even the kernel.
> We can easily drive ourselves crazy following the progress of every
> component of Linux distributions -- following the LSB offers a
> software target for us that is both more stable and easier to follow
> (because it moves more slowly).
LSB all-the-way bay-bee.
Totally with LPI right there.
Solves any "finger pointing" that there is lack of "vendor neutrality."
For anyone in the Jacksonville, FL area, I'm doing a presentation on the
"initialization process" based on LSB 1.3 at JAXLUG on August 17th. I
will be showing example distro implementations of the standard from
Debian/Xandros, Fedora/Red Hat and SuSE/Novell.
-- Bryan
P.S. I'm also going to be presenting in Orlando, FL at LEAP-CF on
August 19th. That presentation will be on accounting systems --
everything from GNUCash's advanced modes to SQL-Ledger, LinuxCanada's
Quasar Accounting and the Compiere ERP-CRM system.
--
Engineers scoff at me because I have IT certifications
IT Pros scoff at me because I am a degreed engineer
I see and understand both of their viewpoints
Unfortunately Engineers and IT Pros only see in me
what they dislike about the other trade
------------------------------------------------------
Bryan J. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
