On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 12:51:16PM +0200, Torsten Scheck wrote: > Evan Leibovitch wrote: > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Just my $0.02: > > > >A certification program such as LPI's is essentially a skills > >standard, and as such we have a responsibility to move slowly and > >cautiously on what is included in this standard. > [...] > >If anything, we need to be vigilant that the LPI program matches > >LSB-mandated tools and versions. When LSB publishes release 2.0 -- now > >in a late beta version -- LPI should determine any changes involved in > >having the LPIC program match the revised LSB standards. Even so, we > >need to produce a roadmap for the community that details the speed at > >which we would implement such changes. > > Agreed. > > But there are many areas where we have to create additional standards. > Especially in security basics we need to present state of the art > knowledge. >
Yes on LSB. I am not sure if LPI will create the additional standards or best practices for that matter. Would be nice to have them though. In addition to keeping up with LSB, newer packages in the distributions may produce other correct answers to existing questions (especially fill in the blank). Those may or may not be governed by LSB. Cheers! _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
