Bart Van Loon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you should have a look at pkgsrc then.
Don't assume I don't run NetBSD as well. ;) In fact, I made generic reference to "ports" and BSD. My greater point was the "ports" approach. > but let's take this discussion of the list. we might be annoying > 1498 people here... :-) Again, my sole point (before some started "distro pissing") was that there can be objectives to map to things that never make it into the exam objectives, and the "ports" type approach is popular in addition to "packages." That's all. It seems too many other people seem interested in pointing out why their distro "rules." The ultimate irony is that I work for a major distro vendor who doesn't use a "ports" approach, and I said I don't support much, yet I'm finding myself defending them because enterprises do use them. Sad. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
