Ian Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> topic numbers (say topic 115). For the current exercise, which involves a
> substantial reswizzle of objectives, maybe just use topic 121, 122, 123,
> etc. instead of reusing any existing topic numbers.
>
> I still think the exam version needs to be exposed in the description, but
> I htink adding it explicitly into the topic numbering might be going too
> far.
I like the idea of just bumping up the objective numbers. The 214
duplication predates my participation with LPI exam development but my guess
is that this happened due to an objective shuffle/split in the early years
(just like the weird progression of LPIC-1 objectives).
Unless someone comes up with a better numbering mechanism, I'm going to:
a) make the version of the objectives 2.0 (the point 0 meaning first revision
of the new objectives).
b) start the objective numbering at 120.1 for LPIC-1 and 220.1 for LPIC-2.
PS - The current LPIC-1/2 objectives are version 1.1 (it just doesn't state
that anywhere officially).
Regards,
--
g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix care, toronto, ontario, ca
phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20
http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
