On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:33 -0500, G. Matthew Rice wrote:
> Paul King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:02 -0500, G. Matthew Rice wrote:
> > > sciguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > You mean, change the numbers from say, 100 to 200? Or use a number that
> > > > reflects the test version number?
> > >
> > > I'm open to any numbering mechanism, if someone can propose something
> > > clean.
> > >
> >
> > I was thinking of something simple, such as just using the major version
> > number in the "hundreds" place, and the major objectives in the
> > tens/ones place. The minor version number would just be used in the
> > title.
>
> Well, the hundreds are currently used for the level of the exam (1==LPIC-1).
>
> How about something like:
>
> <level><major version><2 digit objective>
>
> So we would have something like:
>
> Topic 1201: System Architecture
>
> * 1201.1 Determine and configure hardware settings
> * 1201.2 Boot the system
> * 1201.3 Change runlevels and shutdown or reboot system
>
> Or is that too obfuscated to be useful and we should just make the objective
> versions _very_ obvious everywhere?
>
I was thinking what you have here initially, but now that I see it, I
think a more natural flow might be to have
<level><version><2-digit objective>.
Topic 2101: System Architecture
* 2101.1 Determine and configure hardware settings
* 2101.2 Boot the system
* 2101.3 Change runlevels and shutdown or reboot system
I say it is "more natural" since it is more natural to say "level 2,
version 1" than to say the reverse. The fear is that it might interfere
with your existing system.
Paul King
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
