Paul King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:33 -0500, G. Matthew Rice wrote:
> > How about something like:
> >
> > <level><major version><2 digit objective>
> >
> > Topic 1201: System Architecture
> >
> > * 1201.1 Determine and configure hardware settings
> >
>
> I was thinking what you have here initially, but now that I see it, I
> think a more natural flow might be to have
>
> <level><version><2-digit objective>.
>
> Topic 2101: System Architecture
>
> * 2101.1 Determine and configure hardware settings
>
> I say it is "more natural" since it is more natural to say "level 2,
> version 1" than to say the reverse. The fear is that it might interfere
> with your existing system.
They look pretty close but did you typo the 2101? This is for LPIC-1. An
the versions will probably follow the sequence: 2.0, 2.1 (update), 3.0 (full
redo), 3.1, ...
So with the full version in your model, wouldn't it be:
Topic 12001: System Architecture
* 12001.1 Determine and configure hardware settings
Regards,
--
g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix care, toronto, ontario, ca
phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20
http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
