> Cert exams are like Fight Club, you never, ever talk about the questions, > and particularly not in a public format.
First, I "scrubbed" the questions; my posting omitted key information that might be used be someone to reconstruct the exam. Second, exactly what is the purpose of this mailing list? It's called "exam development". How would a group of people discuss the development of an exam without talking about the questions? The existence of the group invalidates your rationale. I would suggest getting involved in the exam development process, often > times the noticing of a problem is an indication that you're supposed to > help fix it, at least in my experience. What do you think I'm doing? At the very least, you should fill out the comments on the questions, and at > the very most you should contact the director of exam development with your > concerns, not post them to the public list. Ah, yes, the "comments". My computerized exam made no indication of what would *happen* to those comments. Why waste my exam time with something that would be thrown away? > Keep in mind that if a certain number of questions are compromised, it can > mean the republishing of an exam, which is not an inconsiderable expense. There are at least 7 questions which are inherently bogus. Where was the quality control on this thing? How many years of Linux experience did the exam developers have. I wonder. -- Otheus [EMAIL PROTECTED] +43.699.1049.7813
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
