Is LPI monitoring the answer pattern of candidates that pass the exam.
In particular: What Q's are answered WRONG by all candidates that PASS
the exam. These Q's are not discriminating, and possibly wrong. These
Q's should be reviewed / deleted / rewritten.
Othus is right in complaining. "Compromising" those kind f Q's is not
wrong in my opinion. It is up to the exam director to prevent these kind
of Q's appear in the exams in the first place.
--
Vriendelijke Groet / Kind Regards,
Reinier Kleipool
*Open Source Academy*
Rotterdamserijweg 122
3042 AS Rotterdam
the Netherlands
T: +31 654 227144
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Otheus (aka Timothy J. Shelling) wrote:
Cert exams are like Fight Club, you never, ever talk about the
questions, and particularly not in a public format.
First, I "scrubbed" the questions; my posting omitted key information
that might be used be someone to reconstruct the exam.
Second, exactly what is the purpose of this mailing list? It's called
"exam development". How would a group of people discuss the
development of an exam without talking about the questions? The
existence of the group invalidates your rationale.
I would suggest getting involved in the exam development process,
often times the noticing of a problem is an indication that you're
supposed to help fix it, at least in my experience.
What do you think I'm doing?
At the very least, you should fill out the comments on the
questions, and at the very most you should contact the director of
exam development with your concerns, not post them to the public list.
Ah, yes, the "comments". My computerized exam made no indication of
what would /happen/ to those comments. Why waste my exam time with
something that would be thrown away?
Keep in mind that if a certain number of questions are
compromised, it can mean the republishing of an exam, which is not
an inconsiderable expense.
There are at least 7 questions which are inherently bogus. Where was
the quality control on this thing? How many years of Linux experience
did the exam developers have. I wonder.
--
Otheus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+43.699.1049.7813
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
begin:vcard
fn:Reinier Kleipool
n:Kleipool;Reinier
org:Open Source Academy
adr:;;Rotterdamserijweg 122;Rotterdam;;3042 AS;the Netherlands
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Curriculum Advisor
tel;cell:+31 654 227 144
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.OpenSourceAcademy.nl
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
