On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, iddwb wrote:
> This would be interesting. Are they any possibilities of having
> something like an MX record for lpr? Then, the lpr client could
> handling routing around unavailable daemons...
That would require hacking with the DNS protocol, I would imagine, as you
would have to have a DNS server that knows to pass out "LPRX" records of
some kind, and a client resolver library that knows what to do with them.
--
Jeremy Mates http://www.sial.org/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST
The address you post from MUST be your subscription address
If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body. For the impatient,
to subscribe to a list with name LIST, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with: | example:
subscribe LIST <mailaddr> | subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr> | unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have major problems, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
