On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:54 AM Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > > LSB is at a point now where it can either be left to decline, or > > re-vitalized. The latter requires the Linux Foundation to either see it as > > a priority, or transfer the project to someone with money and energy to > > push it forwards. > > Or formally declare it dead. > > Given the potenital to have someone with ill intent controlling it due > to lack of real interest from actual involved parties it would IMHO be far > better it was officially deprecated as historic only.
I agree. As a technical expert for SC22 in Canada it is my opinion that ISO Linux should be removed rather than re-vitalized to avoid an unmaintained standard. I have expressed this opinion to Stephen Mitchell who is also on SC22 and working with the group looking at ISO Linux. I will raise this issue again at the next meeting. It's also my opinion that the LSB should be wound down, and everyone move on to other activities. Cheers, Carlos O'Donell _______________________________________________ lsb-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
