Hi Lou, 

I had looked at the IETF agenda yesterday while we were considering this 
presentation and your request for a swap of CCAMP and TEAS had already been 
fulfilled - https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda.html

So, given that this BIER TE Framework presentation is also being presented in 
the BIER WG, IETF 101 attendees should have ample opportunity to consume it. I 
won't even suggest it be presented in the RTG WG... ;^) 

Thanks,
Acee


´╗┐On 3/7/18, 6:20 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Lou Berger" <lsr-boun...@ietf.org on 
behalf of lber...@labn.net> wrote:

    FWIW TEAS, which clashes with LSR, is in the process of being swapped wth 
    CCAMP.  I expect this should be finalized today or tomorrow...
    
    Lou
    
    
    On March 7, 2018 5:22:59 AM Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote:
    
    >
    > Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> writes:
    >
    >> Thanks, Acee - too bad.
    >>
    >> Very much a fan of creation of LSR. Sad that it meant moving from
    >> two underused WG meetings to one WG meeting that does not have enough
    >> time for new work. Reminds me of TSVWG. *sigh*
    >
    > Well now that's not really fair, is it? This is our second meeting, first 
    > as LSR and we didn't run out of time in the initial joint session.
    >
    > Given that apparently you need to present in TEAS first anyway it seems 
    > like 102 is likely a better fit for an encoding presentation anyway. I'm 
    > fine with you requesting a time slot in 102 right now if you want. We can 
    > also put you on standby for 101 if we have any cancellations. :)
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Chris.
    >
    >> Well, i guess all i am left with is to ask LSR WG members to attend TEAS
    >> on monday and hope my request for slot there will be successful.  
Feedback
    >> on the proposed topology model is important for the design.
    >
    >>
    >> Cheers
    >>     Toerless
    >>
    >> P.S.: When are requests for slots LSR@IEF102 opening up ? ;-))
    >>
    >> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:44PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
    >>> Hi Toerless,
    >>>
    >>> Unfortunately, we have a very full agenda already and are not taking 
    >>> additional presentation for IETF 101. Additionally, you're going to 
need to 
    >>> present it in TEAS anyway due to their mandate...
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>> Acee
    >>>
    >>> ???On 3/6/18, 4:56 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Toerless Eckert" 
    >>> <lsr-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of t...@cs.fau.de> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>     Dear LSR WG chairs,
    >>>
    >>>     I am hereby requesting a slot for LSR WG @IETF101 to present 
subject draft.
    >>>
    >>>     At the core of the proposed framework for the control plane of 
BIER-TE is
    >>>     a proposed topology model for BIER-TE to allow path calculation 
(and other
    >>>     consistency calculation) - distributed through the IGPs.
    >>>
    >>>     I would like to get early feedback before we would start to work on 
the
    >>>     actual encoding of this topology information into IGP LSA/LSP types.
    >>>
    >>>     Cheers
    >>>         Toerless
    >>>
    >>>     _______________________________________________
    >>>     Lsr mailing list
    >>>     Lsr@ietf.org
    >>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
    >>>
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Lsr mailing list
    > Lsr@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
    >
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    Lsr@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
    

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to