Please see inline.. On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Stefano Previdi (IETF) <s...@previdi.net> wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 31, 2018, 6:15 PM Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal < > muthu.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, Jeff. Would be good to have this clarified in >> >> draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis. My original message seems to have been >> stripped off, so including it again for the lsr list.. >> >> Both RFC 7810 and RFC 7471 say that: >> >> The measurement interval, any filter coefficients, and any >> advertisement intervals MUST be configurable per sub-TLV. >> >> Additionally, the default measurement interval for all sub-TLVs >> SHOULD be 30 seconds. >> >> However, both RFCs initially say that they only describe mechanisms for >> disseminating performance information and methods of measurements is >> outside their scope. >> >> Moreover, for a first time reader, it seems to suggest that the >> measurement interval and filter coefficient must be supported and >> configurable under the IGP. >> > > > No. This is not suggested in any form. > It is clearly indicated that the draft does not deal with measurements > which means no recommendation is made. > > > In a system supporting multiple IGPs, I would expect that they be >> implemented outside the IGP and the IGPs just disseminate the information >> provided to them. >> >> Thoughts, especially from an implementation standpoint? >> > > > Again, the draft is only about dissemination, not measurements. > How is the measurement interval and filter coefficients described in the draft related to dissemination? The measurement interval, any filter coefficients, and any advertisement intervals MUST be configurable per sub-TLV. Additionally, the default measurement interval for all sub-TLVs SHOULD be 30 seconds. > If your question is related to configuration and implementation of > measurements, well it will not be addressed by this draft. > > We intentionally left out this part that does not belong to the igp > protocol machinery. > Which of the functionalities described in sections 5, 6, 7 of the draft belong to the IGP protocol machinery? Regards, Muthu > > s. > > > >> Regards. >> Muthu >> >> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Muthu, >>> >>> LSR would be a more suitable list to post to, CCed. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jeff >>> >>> > On May 30, 2018, at 18:06, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal < >>> muthu.a...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Muthu >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> Lsr@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >> >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
