Les, > I am not "teasing". > I also don't think this is much of a secret. > > I am pretty sure experienced implementers know what I am talking about. > (BTW, I include you in that group. :-) )
Ongoing undocumented knowledge is wholly irrelevant when writing standards. There’s simply nothing to reference and thus a tease. It’s true that there is no obligation to document this knowledge, but at the same time, that knowledge cannot be used to pre-empt alternative solutions. > What I am very concerned about is that we are focused on the wrong problem. > We don't have a problem flooding a large number of LSPs on a single interface. The fact that there is undocumented knowledge that completely contradicts established standards that is necessary for scalable operations implies that there is indeed a problem. Tony _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
