Tony - AFAIK no one has suggested or is planning to update/modify a standard.
This falls into a category of standard deviations that was initially documented in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3719 . If the WG feels this is important enough perhaps the best thing to do is update that RFC. I would however like us to agree that the subject of this thread is inappropriate. :-) Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Li <tony1ath...@gmail.com> On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 9:14 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com> > Cc: Henk Smit <hhws...@xs4all.nl>; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Teasing us with secrets > > > Les, > > > Discussion of bypassing the ISO 10589 flooding pacing timer was done in > public many years ago when sub-second convergence was introduced. > > Here is one public paper: > > > > https://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/publications/achieving-sub-second-igp- > convergence-.html > > > > There are also multiple vendor specific configuration guides which discuss > tuning LSP pacing for fast convergence - please consult your favorite vendor's > documentation links (not my place to share such links). > > > > No doubt others can find other public references. > > > Thank you for the reference, that’s helpful. > > Are you aware of the standards status of this document vs ISO 10589? > > It seems to me that unless there’s some document on the standards track > that the average developer might not comply with it. > > Tony _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
